Arunachal Pradesh, which attained full statehood on Feb. 20, 1987, under the 55th Amendment to the Indian Constitution, is an integral part of the Indian Union. Its constitutional authenticity is further underscored by Article 371H, which grants special responsibilities to its Governor, particularly concerning law and order, acknowledging the state's strategic location and unique socio-political landscape. Like other Indian states, it possesses its own elected Legislative Assembly and parliamentary representation, fully operating within India's democratic framework.
However, a funadamental aspect of Arunachal Pradesh's identity lies in its predominantly indigenous tribal population. The state is home to dozens of distinct ethnic groups and over a hundred sub-tribes, each with its unique customs, languages and spiritual beliefs. Many of these indigenous communities fiercely assert their distinct cultural and religious identities, often viewing them as separate from mainstream Indian traditions.
A significant point of distinction is the Donyi-Polo faith, an indigenous animistic and polytheistic belief system centred on the worship of the sun (Donyi) and the Moon (Polo), along with nature spirits and ancestors. Adherents of Donyi-Poloism and other indigenous faiths emphasize that their spiritual practices are not a sect or part of Hinduism, but rather independent and ancient traditions integral to their heritage. This distinction is vital for their cultural self-determination and recognition.
The cultural identity of Arunachal Pradesh's indigenous tribes is further highlighted by dietary practices, particularly the traditional consumption of beef and pork. These meats are often central to their daily diets, festivals and rituals. This stands in stark contrast to the dietary restrictions prevalent in mainstream Hinduism (where beef is largely forbidden) and Islam (where pork is strictly forbidden). These dietary differences serve as a visible and significant marker distinguishing indigenous tribal communities from many non-tribal populations, including Hindus and Muslims, who have historically migrated to the state for economic or professional reasons.
To safeguard the distinct iddentity, culture and land rights of these indigenous tribes, Arunachal Pradesh maintain the Inner Line Permit (ILP) system. A legacy of the Britishers Bengal Eastern Frontier Regulation of 1873, the ILP restricts entry for Indian citizens from other states, requiring them to obtain a permit. This system, fiercely defended by indigenous groups, is seen as a crucial protective barrier against demographic changes, cultural dilution and potential exploitation by "outsiders".
Despite India's constitutional commitment to secularism- ensuring state neutrality towards all religions and freedom of religion dor all citizens - the uniqu context of Arunachal Pradesh presents complexx dynamics. Concerns are often raised by indigenous communities about the dilution of their cultural and traditional practices by external influences, including those brought by non-tribal migrants and , at times, by governmental policies.
Specifically, there is apprehension regarding perceived efforts to promote a majoritarian Hindu nationalist agenda, which can clash with indigenous customs. While Arunachal Pradesh has not implemented a full beef ban, the push for stricter cattle protection laws in other parts of the Northeast, influenced by the ruling national party's ideology, is often viewed by tribal communities as an infringement on their cultural and dietary freedom. This fuels anxieties about the imposition of external cultural norms and the erosion of their distinct identity. Laws like the Arunachal Pradesh Freedom of Religion Act, 1978, while ostensibly prohibitng forced conversions, are also subjects of debate, with some viewing them as tools that could be used to target conversions to certain religions while potentially facilitating others.
Arunachal Pradesh embodies a fascinating interplay between its status as a constitutional state of India and its profound identity as land of diverse, vibrant and fiercely protective indigenous tribes. The ongoing discourse in the state revolves around balancing national integration with the imperative to preserve its unique cultural heritage against the pressures of modernization, migration and political-religious ideologies. The core challenge remains ensuring the fundamental authenticity of its indigenous peoples is recognized and safeguarded within the brader framework of the Indian Constitution.
